FPM: municipalities share R$3.4 billion from the 2nd installment of June

This is the third consecutive increase in the FPM, which also grew in the last transfer of May and the first of June. Considering only this month’s transfers compared to the same month in 2023, the FPM accumulates R$2 billion more, a real increase of more than 20%.

Public budget specialist, Cesar Lima says that, although the current scenario is positive, managers must pay attention to the direction of the economy in the coming months, which could impact FPM transfers.

“We have another good result from the FPM compared to last year and we are resuming growth. We have seen news of record collections in a row, but there is a worrying horizon due to the increase in the IPCA, which could slow down this downward trend in interest rates, reduce consumption, affect revenue a little in the future and, finally, the transfer to municipalities.

Dependency

With less than 25 thousand inhabitants, the Amazonian municipality of Rio Preto da Eva (AM) stimulated the local tourism sector as a way of diversifying its own sources of revenue and depending less on the FPM, points out mayor Anderson Sousa. “We have created some sports fishing, jungle hiking and adventure lodges, we have several service providers and this generates revenue”, he says

This Thursday, Rio Preto da Eva receives around R$750,000 from the FPM and, despite being just a supplement to the municipal coffers, the transfer is still important for the balance of local accounts. “The FPM is a significant source of income for our municipality, where we have the opportunity to plan our payroll”, he highlights.

Blocked municipalities

Until last Sunday (16), 37 municipalities were prevented from receiving the FPM, according to the Integrated Financial Administration System (Siafi).

The National Confederation of Municipalities (CNM) highlights that among the main reasons behind blocking the transfer of the FPM are debts between the city hall and the National Social Security Institute (INSS), lack of payment for the Public Servant Assets Training Program , Pasep, active debts with the Attorney General of the National Treasury (PGFN); and the lack of accountability in the Public Health Budget Information System (Siops).

Check if your city is on the list.

1. Angicos (RN)
2. Avaré (SP)
3. Anísio de Abreu (PI)
4. Cândido Sales (BA)
5. Canguaretama (RN)
6. Campo Maior (PI)
7. Chapel (SE)
8. Carapebus (RJ)
9. Careiro (AM)
10. Carmópolis (SE)
11. Caroebe (RR)
12. Cocalzinho de Goiás (GO)
13. Corumbaíba (GO)
14. Crateús (CE)
15. Tabocão Fortress (TO)
16. Iaciara (GO)
17. Indianapolis (MG)
18. Ipiranga de Goiás (GO)
19. Itamaraju (BA)
20. Japaratuba (SE)
21. Madeiro (PI)
22. Mata Verde (MG)
23. Moreira Sales (PR)
24. Mucurici (ES)
25. Natal (RN)
26. Paranã (TO)
27. Pedro Gomes (MS)
28. Philippines (PI)
29. Quipapa (PE)
30. Saloá (PE)
31. São João da Baliza (RR)
32. Santana de São Francisco (SE)
33. Santa Teresa do Tocantins (TO)
34. São Sebastião (AL)
35. Saquarema (RJ)
36. Umbaúba (SE)
37. Vila Bela da Santíssima Trindade (MT)

The public manager who wants to unlock the resources must identify the reason and the body responsible for the freezing. From then on, you should try to regularize the situation. The city hall does not lose the money permanently. It only stays blocked while there are pending issues.

FPM: May ends with a positive balance for city halls